Introduction: AWS MSK vs Confluent – Understanding the Right Choice for Kafka
Kafka is a powerful service for streaming real-time data, but deploying and configuring it is cumbersome and complex. Several managed Kafka services simplify deployment and offer different features. However, we must trade-off between these features to select the one that best fits our use cases. AWS MSK and Confluent Kafka are two popular solutions, and each one offers unique advantages. We must evaluate performance, cost, and features to choose the right solution. We compare AWS MSK vs Confluent across several key features to assist with making an informed decision. Our goal is for you to understand which Kafka solution aligns best with your use cases.
Section 1: AWS MSK vs Confluent: Performance and Scalability Comparison
1.1 Scalability and Elasticity: AWS MSK vs Confluent Kafka
AWS MSK scales automatically with AWS infrastructure, making it a strong contender in the AWS MSK vs Confluent debate. But there’s a catch: you’re limited to certain EC2 instance types. This can be a real constraint. On the other hand, Confluent Kafka offers fine-grained scalability and operates across multiple cloud environments, making it a flexible alternative in the Confluent Kafka vs AWS MSK comparison. Another MSK constraint is relying on AWS EBS for storage, while Confluent has more advanced tiered storage options, making it more flexible. Confluent also provides auto-balancing for optimizing partition distribution, whereas MSK does not support automatic partition scaling. Therefore, we should consider workload variability and growth projections when choosing a managed solution. Choosing the right managed Kafka solution depends on scalability and elasticity. For a deeper dive into how big data technologies are transforming industries, read our article on the Big Data Revolution.
1.2 Latency and Throughput: Comparing AWS MSK and Confluent
Whereas Confluent provides more flexible choices, AWS MSK is native to AWS and more tightly integrated with AWS infrastructure. This allows it to reduce latency for AWS-based applications. Confluent Cloud is capable of supporting low-latency processing through optimized networking and performance tuning. In fact, benchmarks have demonstrated that Confluent Cloud can deliver high throughput per node despite MSK being native to AWS infrastructure. Also, AWS MSK users may often need to fine-tune their Kafka configurations to achieve peak performance, even though it is native to AWS. It is possible that Confluent optimizations may have an edge for real-time analytics. For businesses optimizing real-time data pipelines, latency and throughput are key considerations. Learn more about enhancing data processing in our Optimizing Spark Performance and Speed article.
1.3 Data Durability: Amazon MSK vs Confluent Kafka
AWS MSK can leverage AWS native features like Multi-AZ replication for resilience. In addition, it can perform automatic backups via AWS Backup. However, cross-region failover capabilities are limited. On the other hand, For disaster recovery? Confluent Kafka uses Cluster Linking, a truly enterprise-grade solution. And their tiered storage? That’s a game-changer for long-term data retention, significantly lowering costs. Despite AWS MSK being native to AWS, Confluent’s redundancy options provide better high availability to businesses.
1.4 Integration with Cloud and On-Premises Services
Here, we need to make crucial decisions on our exact use case. For AWS-centric solutions, AWS MSK is optimized for seamless integration with AWS-native services like Lambda, S3, and Kinesis. However, when connecting to non-AWS services, MSK users may need to develop custom integrations.
For hybrid solutions, Confluent offers seamless integration across multiple cloud providers and on-premise environments. Confluence easily supports diverse data sources by providing pre-built connectors, which reduces development efforts. This makes Confluent integration more versatile when considering hybrid or multi-cloud architectures.
1.5 Security and Compliance
MSK inherits AWS IAM policies for access control, but Confluent offers RBAC (Role-Based Access Control) and data encryption by default. Confluent also supports more advanced security features like Private Link, even though both services provide TLS encryption. Also, both services meet minimum compliance standards, such as GDPR and HIPAA, but Confluent has broader certifications. This extended compliance support makes Confluent a better choice for more stringent security needs.
Section 2: MSK vs Confluent: Cost Breakdown and Pricing Models
2.1 Pricing Models
Businesses need to estimate total ownership costs when choosing a solution and therefore must understand their pricing structures. AWS MKS does provide pay-as-you-go solution where businesses pay for broker instances and storage. But MSK also charges separately for storage and data transfer that increases costs. Confluent Cloud provides the flexibility on either usage-based pricing or committed plans for cost optimizations. It also offers tiered pricing model that includes additional enterprise features.
2.2 Infrastructure and Operational Costs
In addition to infrastructure costs there are also operational costs that companies should consider. MSK also involves additional AWS costs including VPC and data transfer fees. While MSK is a managed service it still requires in-hourse expertise which increases operational overhead. However, Confluent Cloud is a fully managed service that reduces administrative burdens. Confluent Cloud also bundles operational expenses thus simplifying cost estimation.
2.3 Cost Efficiency for Different Workloads
Businesses must analyze workload patterns to optimize cost efficiency. AWS MSK’s main cost advantage is when adopting strictly AWS-centric solutions with workloads tightly integrated with AWS. However, high-throughput workloads may require additional MSK resources and increase costs. Where there is fluctuating demand with dynamic workloads, Confluent’s usage-based pricing is beneficial. Also, Confluent’s tiered storage model makes long-term data retention cheaper. Cost efficiency is a crucial factor when selecting a managed Kafka service. See how big data technologies, including Kafka, drive urban innovation in our Big Data and Smart Cities article.
2.4 Data Transfer and Egress Charges
Many businesses must work with cross-region workloads that can hide data transfer costs, and businesses must access these. AWS MSK operating in multi-regions introduces VPC peering and NAT gateway expenses. They also incur egress fees when moving data outside of AWS regions. Confluent provides two distinct advantages, it minimizes data movement through optimized replication. The other advance is its hybrid cloud support that can reduce inter-region transfer costs.
2.5 Licensing and Enterprise Support
Service agreements are often the fine print for enterprises requiring premium support. AWS MSK does include standard AWS support but advanced support costs extra. Also, advanced troubleshooting for MSK may require third-party Kafka support. Confluent provides several options in their service agreements including support tiers along with 24/7 enterprise support. It also provides dedicated SLAs for large-scale deployments.
Conclusion: Making the Right Choice Between AWS MSK and Confluent Kafka
Although AWS MSK and Confluent both provide managed Kafka services, they have different strengths and are suited to different use cases. However, Confluent is generally more suited to a broader range of use cases. This includes high-performance, multi-cloud, and enterprise-level applications. Whereas AWS MSK is better suited for architectures that are AWS-centric and are not coupled with other environments. Along with use case requirements, it is essential to factor in costs and performance. Another consideration is long term evolution of any solution that businesses decide to implement. One solution may offer quick wins in the short term but may impede long-term growth and may eventually need replacement.
Further Reading
Disclosure: Some of the links below are affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you.
Want to deepen your knowledge of Kafka and real-time data streaming? Check out these highly-rated books:
- Kafka: The Definitive Guide: Real-Time Data and Stream Processing at Scale, Neha Narkhede, Gwen Shapira, and Todd Palino.
- Effective Kafka: A Hands-On Guide to Building Robust and Scalable Event-Driven Applications, Emil Koutanov.
